Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro vs IceRiver KS5 Pro
Mining profitability comparison for Kaspa (KAS)
Verdict: Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro vs IceRiver KS5 Pro
For Kaspa mining, the IceRiver KS5 Pro is the more efficient choice, delivering roughly 17% more hashrate per watt than the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro. The Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro draws 50W less, cutting electricity costs by about $31/year at $0.07/kWh. Bottom line: if power efficiency is your priority, the IceRiver KS5 Pro is the stronger pick — but confirm with your real electricity rate and current hardware prices below, since acquisition cost ultimately drives ROI.
Specifications
| Spec | Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro | IceRiver KS5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Type | ASIC | ASIC |
| Algorithm | ||
| Hashrate (KAS) | 21 TH/s | 25 TH/s |
| Power Draw | 3150 W | 3200 W |
| Efficiency | 150 J/TH | 128 J/TH |
| Supported Coins | KAS | KAS |
| Release Year | N/A | N/A |
Hashrate & Efficiency per Coin
| Coin | Bitmain Pro HR | IceRiver Pro HR | Power A | Power B | More Efficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAS | 21 TH/s | 25 TH/s | 3150 W | 3200 W | KS5 ✓ |
Daily Electricity Cost at Different Rates
Electricity cost only (not including coin revenue). Lower is better for any given rate.
| Electricity Rate | Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro | IceRiver KS5 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.04/kWh | $3.02 | $3.07 | -$0.05 (A cheaper) |
| $0.06/kWh | $4.54 | $4.61 | -$0.07 (A cheaper) |
| $0.07/kWh | $5.29 | $5.38 | -$0.08 (A cheaper) |
| $0.1/kWh | $7.56 | $7.68 | -$0.12 (A cheaper) |
| $0.12/kWh | $9.07 | $9.22 | -$0.14 (A cheaper) |
| $0.15/kWh | $11.34 | $11.52 | -$0.18 (A cheaper) |
| $0.2/kWh | $15.12 | $15.36 | -$0.24 (A cheaper) |
Pros & Cons
Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro
- Highest kHeavyHash hashrate in the Bitmain KS lineup (21 TH/s)
- Kaspa's 1-second block time provides smooth, frequent rewards
- Best-in-class KAS efficiency vs competing ASICs
- High acquisition cost ($5,000–$6,500 new)
- 3,150 W draw requires dedicated industrial electrical infrastructure
- Kaspa-only hardware — no algorithm switching fallback
IceRiver KS5 Pro
- Best efficiency in IceRiver's current Kaspa lineup (128 J/TH)
- 25 TH/s — 25% more hashrate than the KS5L at lower power per TH
- IceRiver native firmware with stable pool integration
- Higher acquisition cost than KS5L (~$6,000–$7,500)
- Still trails the Antminer KS7 on total hashrate (25 vs 70 TH/s)
- Kaspa-only hardware — no algorithm flexibility
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro or IceRiver KS5 Pro more profitable for Kaspa mining?
Based on hashrate-per-watt efficiency, the IceRiver KS5 Pro is more efficient for Kaspa mining. However, actual profitability depends on your electricity cost, hardware acquisition price, and coin price — use the live calculator for exact numbers.
What is the power consumption difference between the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro and IceRiver KS5 Pro?
For Kaspa mining, the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro draws 3150 W while the IceRiver KS5 Pro draws 3200 W. The Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro uses 50 W less power, which at $0.07/kWh saves ~$31 per year in electricity.
Can both the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro and IceRiver KS5 Pro mine the same coins?
Yes — both units can mine Kaspa (KAS).
Which unit has a better ROI?
ROI depends on hardware acquisition price, electricity cost, and coin price trajectory. The more efficient unit (better J/TH or hashrate per watt) will generally have a lower operating cost per coin mined, but the absolute ROI timeline is determined by the purchase price. Always model both units in the MiningReturns calculator with your specific electricity rate and current market prices.
More Comparisons
Enter your electricity rate for live earnings estimates on both units.