Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro vs IceRiver KS5L
Mining profitability comparison for Kaspa (KAS)
Verdict: Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro vs IceRiver KS5L
For Kaspa mining, the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro is the more efficient choice, delivering roughly 13% more hashrate per watt than the IceRiver KS5L. The Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro draws 250W less, cutting electricity costs by about $153/year at $0.07/kWh. Bottom line: if power efficiency is your priority, the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro is the stronger pick — but confirm with your real electricity rate and current hardware prices below, since acquisition cost ultimately drives ROI.
Specifications
| Spec | Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro | IceRiver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| Type | ASIC | ASIC |
| Algorithm | ||
| Hashrate (KAS) | 21 TH/s | 20 TH/s |
| Power Draw | 3150 W | 3400 W |
| Efficiency | 150 J/TH | 170 J/TH |
| Supported Coins | KAS | KAS |
| Release Year | N/A | N/A |
Hashrate & Efficiency per Coin
| Coin | Bitmain Pro HR | IceRiver KS5L HR | Power A | Power B | More Efficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAS | 21 TH/s | 20 TH/s | 3150 W | 3400 W | KS5 ✓ |
Daily Electricity Cost at Different Rates
Electricity cost only (not including coin revenue). Lower is better for any given rate.
| Electricity Rate | Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro | IceRiver KS5L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.04/kWh | $3.02 | $3.26 | -$0.24 (A cheaper) |
| $0.06/kWh | $4.54 | $4.90 | -$0.36 (A cheaper) |
| $0.07/kWh | $5.29 | $5.71 | -$0.42 (A cheaper) |
| $0.1/kWh | $7.56 | $8.16 | -$0.60 (A cheaper) |
| $0.12/kWh | $9.07 | $9.79 | -$0.72 (A cheaper) |
| $0.15/kWh | $11.34 | $12.24 | -$0.90 (A cheaper) |
| $0.2/kWh | $15.12 | $16.32 | -$1.20 (A cheaper) |
Pros & Cons
Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro
- Highest kHeavyHash hashrate in the Bitmain KS lineup (21 TH/s)
- Kaspa's 1-second block time provides smooth, frequent rewards
- Best-in-class KAS efficiency vs competing ASICs
- High acquisition cost ($5,000–$6,500 new)
- 3,150 W draw requires dedicated industrial electrical infrastructure
- Kaspa-only hardware — no algorithm switching fallback
IceRiver KS5L
- Competitive 20 TH/s kHeavyHash hashrate
- IceRiver-native firmware with straightforward pool setup
- Lower acquisition price than KS5 Pro in some markets
- Less efficient than KS5 Pro (170 vs 150 W/TH)
- Smaller IceRiver support and firmware ecosystem vs Bitmain
- Kaspa-only — no algorithm flexibility
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro or IceRiver KS5L more profitable for Kaspa mining?
Based on hashrate-per-watt efficiency, the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro is more efficient for Kaspa mining. However, actual profitability depends on your electricity cost, hardware acquisition price, and coin price — use the live calculator for exact numbers.
What is the power consumption difference between the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro and IceRiver KS5L?
For Kaspa mining, the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro draws 3150 W while the IceRiver KS5L draws 3400 W. The Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro uses 250 W less power, which at $0.07/kWh saves ~$153 per year in electricity.
Can both the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro and IceRiver KS5L mine the same coins?
Yes — both units can mine Kaspa (KAS).
Which unit has a better ROI?
ROI depends on hardware acquisition price, electricity cost, and coin price trajectory. The more efficient unit (better J/TH or hashrate per watt) will generally have a lower operating cost per coin mined, but the absolute ROI timeline is determined by the purchase price. Always model both units in the MiningReturns calculator with your specific electricity rate and current market prices.
More Comparisons
Enter your electricity rate for live earnings estimates on both units.